蜜桃视频

A Deeper Understanding of Critical Feminist Methodology

Depok, October 3, 2024 鈥� The 蜜桃视频 Faculty of Education held a thought-provoking public lecture on Thursday, October 3, featuring Prof. Nina Nurmila, Dean of the Faculty of Education. Speaking to a packed audience in Theater Hall Faculty A, Prof. Nurmila explored the intricacies of critical feminist methodology, a vital yet often debated aspect of modern research.

Prof. Nina Nurmila is a distinguished Professor of Gender and Islamic Studies. She earned her MA from Murdoch University in 1997 and a PhD from the University of Melbourne in 2007. Her academic journey includes prestigious roles such as a Fulbright Visiting Researcher at Temple University in Philadelphia in 2000, an Endeavour Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Technology, Sydney, in 2008, and a Fulbright Visiting Professor of Islamic Studies at the University of Redlands, California, from 2008 to 2009. 

Prof. Nurmila began by addressing ongoing debates from the 1990s over whether feminist methodology stands as a distinct research paradigm and methodology. She pointed out that opponents have argued against its independence, suggesting that feminist methodologies lack a unique perspective and draw heavily from established paradigms like Marxism and critical theory. Others contend that feminist approaches lack coherence due to the diverse perspectives within feminism itself. 

However, Prof. Nurmila presented a compelling case for recognizing feminist methodology as unique, emphasizing its intentional rejection of male-dominated research paradigms. 鈥淔eminist researchers prioritize women鈥檚 perspectives and their societal positions, presenting a contrast to traditional methodologies focused primarily on male experiences,鈥� she explained. She further noted that feminist research introduces a unique lens for understanding the world, often centered around the impact of patriarchy. 

The criteria that define feminist methodology, as presented by Prof. Nurmila, include examining issues through a female prism, in which women are both the focus and interpreters of inquiry. Feminist methodology also encourages 鈥渃onsciousness raising,鈥� a quality described as the advantage that female researchers have in understanding women鈥檚 experiences from within an 鈥渙ppressed group.鈥� She added that this 鈥渄ouble vision鈥� enables feminist researchers to empathize deeply and interpret their findings more accurately. 

Highlighting her own work, Prof. Nurmila referenced several examples of feminist research, including her publications like 鈥淲omen, Islam, and Everyday Life鈥� (Routledge, 2009) and an article examining husband-wife dynamics (Al-Jamia鈥檃h: Journal of Islamic Studies, 2013). She reflected on how feminist methodology shapes her qualitative research, occasionally integrating quantitative data while retaining a feminist analytical lens. 

In her conclusion, Prof. Nurmila discussed how feminist methodologies transform traditional academic language structures, shifting from objective, passive language to more subjective, active voice. She also emphasized the importance of non-gender-biased language, advocating for inclusive terms such as 鈥渉uman power鈥� rather than 鈥渕anpower鈥�. 

Prof. Nurmila鈥檚 lecture left the audience with a deeper understanding of critical feminist methodology and its transformative impact on research. Through her insights, she highlighted the importance of inclusivity and empowerment within academia, calling on future researchers to consider feminist perspectives in fostering societal progress.  The event exemplified 蜜桃视频鈥檚 commitment to fostering an environment open to new perspectives in research, welcoming research paradigms, methodologies, and methods that advocate for societal change and scholarly diversity. 

More From Editorials

Exploring Collaborative Research: Dr. Maretha Dellarosa鈥檚 Insights at 蜜桃视频

Dr. Elizabeth Summerfield Shares Insights on 鈥楩inding Your Voice in Research鈥�

BRIN Researcher Presents Findings on the Paradox of Feminism In Indonesia